UX Research · Coensio × Kariyer.net

Why buyers weren't using the product they paid for

Companies were purchasing Coensio, a candidate assessment platform, and then never sending a single test. I designed and ran a user interview study to find out why and turned the answers into an action plan.

Role

UX Researcher

Method

Semi-structured user
interviews

Participants

10 client companies

Platform

Coensio
(Kariyer.net ATS add-on)

The problem

Coensio is a candidate assessment platform developed in partnership with Kariyer.net, bundled as an add-on to plans within the Kariyer.net ATS. The business noticed a troubling discrepancy: many clients who had purchased Coensio had never used it to send assessment tests.

A gap like that is an early churn signal. Clients who pay for something they don't use won't renew it, and they may distrust the next upsell, too.

Research question: Why isn't Coensio being used by the companies who purchased the service, and what needs to be done to increase usership?

Designing the study

I recruited from real purchase data using a two-question screener: did the client purchase Coensio, and did they ever send an assessment test? This let me focus precisely on the purchased-but-unused segment.

The interview guide probed the full chain between purchase and use, because a failure at any link would explain the silence:

  1. At the time of purchase, were you aware you were buying this service as an add-on?
  2. Are there open positions in your organization compatible with the assessment tests Coensio offers?
  3. Is your HR team aware this service is available to use during recruitment?
  4. Did your HR team receive a briefing on how to use it?
  5. Why has your HR team chosen not to use the service?

What the interviews revealed

I mapped every participant against two dimensions: whether Coensio was actually compatible with their hiring needs at purchase time, and whether the team was even aware the product existed on their account.

Interview outcomes matrix showing compatibility and awareness per client, with company details redacted
The outcomes matrix (client details redacted). Most non-users were either outside the product's target audience or simply unaware they owned it.

Two patterns dominated. Most non-using clients were not the target customer at all — the assessment tests didn't match the roles they hire for, which points upstream to how the add-on was being sold. The second group had compatible roles but their HR teams didn't know the product existed on their account. The purchase decision and the daily recruitment work were happening in different rooms.

From findings to action

The recommendations targeted each broken link in the chain:

Concrete next steps handed to the team:

Why this project matters to me

Nothing about this problem was visible in the interface. The product worked; people just never arrived at it. It's the clearest example in my work of research redirecting effort away from the product itself and toward the opportunities in sales, onboarding, and internal adoption.